On 22-5-2015 18:48, Joe Julian wrote: > This is a concept that needs some work to implement, but could > potentially see a benefit from that topography: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/15IiPVIPMzgGwkt1sKuIusRE2l3pQY6NnA4WmWaMsFJE/edit?usp=sharing > > On 05/22/2015 09:02 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >>> Hi there, >>> I'm planning to setup a 3-Node Cluster for oVirt and would like to >>> use 56 GBe >>> (RoCe) >>> exclusively for GlusterFS. Since 56 GBe switches are far too >>> expensive and >>> it's not >>> planned to add more nodes and furthermore this would add a SPOF I'd >>> like to >>> cross connect the nodes as shown in the diagram below: >>> Node 1 Node 2 Node3 >>> ||_______||________|| >>> |___________________| >>> This way there's a dedicated 56 Gbit connection to/from each member >>> node. >>> Is is possible to do this with GlusterFS? >>> My first thought was to have different IPs on each node's /etc/host >>> mapped to >>> the node >>> hostnames but I'm unsure if I can force GlusterFS to hostnames >>> instead of >>> IPs. >> I think this will work since the VMs will be running on the same 3 gluster hosts making all traffic local to the cluster, it wouldn't work without extra effort if you had a seperate set of hosts acting as clients. You can still seperate rebalancing traffic to a seperate subnet/vlan if you wish. Regards, Joop _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
