On 16 May 2015, at 10:07, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > The 3.7.0 release should be ready for usual production deployments. There is no way this is the case. We've done a huge amount of feature additions with little testing outside our own regression tests. We simply don't know how it functions on people's environments. "Feature addition" doesn't mean existing features weren't touched and adapted to suit... they definitely were. So even existing features have had code changes. There is no way this should be run in production environments (or anywhere people really depend on their data), without extensive testing in a non-production environment first. If someone doesn't have a non-production environment to test stuff in first, stick with 3.6.3 (and later 3.6.x series) for now, until other people have shaken out the first "show stopper" 3.7.x bugs. We *could* be super lucky and have managed to create a defect free release purely by sheer awesomeness. But we're more likely to see unicorns running around In Real Life tomorrow. Just my opinion... ;) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
