Happy to hear that there are plans to improve the GlusterFS documentation! I've realized myself that I once wanted to contribute to the docs, but wasn't sure "where to". If the diverse sources of gluster's docs are now going to be merged to a central entity, that would very likely improve contributions from the community. On 03/23/2015 10:34 PM, Justin Clift wrote: > * Gluster Ant Logo image - The first letter REALLY looks like a C > (to me), not a G. Reads as "Cluster" for me... I personally also prefer the font used for the "Gluster community" logo in the upper left corner. It "feels" a bit more like a proper trademark. I like that :) Something else I wanted to mention is, that I found it very confusing / intimidating that some articles referred to specific version numbers in their title. For example "Gluster 3.2: Migrating Volumes" [1]. I wasn't sure if I should follow instructions listed there, if I'm using a different gluster version (e.g. 3.4). Especially, because there is one for "3.1", for example. So I tried to replace "3.2" with "3.4" in the URL, as I would have expected a naming convention in that case. Search also didn't list anything. So, in the end, I gave up and used the 3.2 docs. I assume it's so because nothing has changed with "Migrating Volumes", for example since 3.2 - but how will I know if the docs I find apply to my version? That's something I think might be nice if that's solved somehow in the new docs. Thanks and regards, Pb == References: [1] http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.2:_Migrating_Volumes _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
