Interesting, thanks. :) We seem to have a bunch of spurious regression test failures that need looking at. It's making it pretty hard to figure out which failures are a serious problem-that-needs-addressing-now vs something transient that is lower priority (but still needs looking at). I'm trying to get stuff setup so I can do some bulk regression test runs this weekend, then correlate results to find patterns and see what's what. Results will be emailed here, for us all to look at and take from there. ;) + Justin On 20 Feb 2015, at 11:39, Kiran Patil <kiran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I rerun the above failed tests on ext4 and below are the one who failed. > > tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t > tests/basic/volume-snapshot.t > tests/bugs/bug-1045333.t > tests/bugs/bug-1087198.t > tests/bugs/bug-1113975.t > tests/bugs/bug-1117851.t > tests/bugs/bug-1161886/bug-1161886.t > tests/bugs/bug-1162498.t > tests/bugs/bug-765380.t > tests/bugs/bug-824753.t > > Thanks, > Kiran. > > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Kiran Patil <kiran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Please find the below gluster regression test summary report. >> >> Test Summary Report >> ------------------- >> ./tests/basic/ec/quota.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 22 Failed: 2) >> Failed tests: 16, 20 >> ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 21 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 18 >> ./tests/basic/quota.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 73 Failed: 4) >> Failed tests: 24, 28, 32, 65 >> ./tests/basic/uss.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 158 Failed: 8) >> Failed tests: 37-38, 69-70, 99-100, 127-128 >> ./tests/basic/volume-snapshot.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 29 Failed: 2) >> Failed tests: 28-29 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-1023974.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 15 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 12 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-1038598.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 28 Failed: 6) >> Failed tests: 17, 21-22, 26-28 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-1045333.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 15 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-1087198.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 26 Failed: 2) >> Failed tests: 18, 23 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-1113975.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 13 Failed: 3) >> Failed tests: 11-13 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-1117851.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 15 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-1161886/bug-1161886.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 4) >> Failed tests: 13-16 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-1162498.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30 Failed: 13) >> Failed tests: 10, 19-30 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-765380.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 6 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-824753.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1) >> Failed test: 11 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729-mode-script.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 23 Failed: 2) >> Failed tests: 19, 23 >> ./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729.t >> (Wstat: 0 Tests: 23 Failed: 2) >> Failed tests: 19, 23 >> Files=296, Tests=8411, 8656 wallclock secs ( 3.62 usr 1.97 sys + >> 527.17 cusr 683.51 csys = 1216.27 CPU) >> Result: FAIL >> >> Thanks, >> Kiran. > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
