Re: 3 Node Replicated Gluster set up as a ring - a good idea?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think switches are much faster at their job than the kernel and avoiding their use may be a mistake.

With regard to gluster, latency affects performance so if it's performance you're looking for, lowest latency switches would be wiser.

If it's just network design you're asking for, this might not be the most appropriate forum.

On February 14, 2015 2:19:43 AM PST, Ml Ml <mliebherr99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello List,

i would like to build a 3 Node Cluster. I was thinking of such a setup:

http://oi58.tinypic.com/2rfgghi.jpg

My question:

Can i set it up my network that way, that it will still work of one node fails?

Just thinking about i want bonding and then i might even need a brige
to bring the "two sides of the nodes together"?

Will i then get loop? Do i need SPF or something alike?

Could i also use TCP Multipath? ( i have no experience with tcp
multipath so far)

What do you think?


Thanks,
Mario

p.s. i want to avoid switches here.


Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux