I do a basic series of tests after upgrade including:
This process takes about a day or so to burn in.
-bonnie++
-failover, shutdown of bricks
-self-heal after simulated brick failure
-Test VMs - similar to those running in production - run unit tests against those VMs
-bonnie++ inside VMs and compare results to previous run.
I'm open to suggestions on other tests though.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/20/2014 04:25 AM, Vince Loschiavo wrote:
What tests do you run?I'm running 3.6.1 in pre-production right now. So far so good. No critical bugs found.
Pranith
Centos 6.5,QEMU/KVMFuse Mount
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Joe Julian <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/19/2014 01:34 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:26:15 +01003.4 has some, imho, critical known bugs with fixes that have already been applied to 3.5 and were not backported. For this lack of support I no longer recommend 3.4.
Andreas Hollaus <Andreas.Hollaus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,Hmm, this is might help from the robustness/features perspective: :)
I'm curious about the different 'families' of GlusterFS (3.4, 3.5 &
3.6). What's the differences between them and how do I know which one
will be most suitable for my application (depending on if I
prioritize robustness or lots of features)?
* 3.4.x series has been around for ages now, so is pretty battle
tested. We still release patch versions for this for important
bugs which show up.
This is the version I currently recommend.
* 3.5.x series has been around a while as well, and is also pretty
well tested by now. It has more features / and several internal
optimisations/improvements over the 3.4.x series. We release
patches for this series too for important bugs that show up.
I'm still waiting on significant reports of success before I'll recommend 3.6. I also watch for bugs that can only be fixed in this release, or lack of support for prior releases, or significant improvements in usability before I upgrade my recommendations.
* 3.6.x series just came out. It's our latest and greatest feature
set, but may be a bit "bleeding edge" until the next patch release
(3.6.2), which should be coming out soon.
This makes me realise we really need a version/features table on the
website, with ticks and crosses to show which version of GlusterFS
added what. :D
+ Justin
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
-Vince Loschiavo
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-Vince Loschiavo
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
