Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusterfs backlogs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Atin,

FMPOV, 2 weeks time looks to be good, at the same time, please give importance for the product version it is reported. If they are into our running stable or near versions, we can be some more flexible.

--Humble

--Humble


On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Folks,

While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are few BZs
which were marked as "needinfo" on the reporter as the information was
not sufficient enough for further analysis and the reporter hasn't
gotten back with the required details.

Ideally we should close these bugs saying inadequate information,
however I am just wondering should we set a timeline for the waiting
period like 1 or 2 weeks if not more and then close all such instances
to reduce the count.

What do you guys think?

~Atin
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux