Re: Why is xfs recommended?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/12/2014 10:31 PM, Dennis Schafroth wrote:
Is it know whether the fix will work for other filesystems like btrfs and HFS+
hi Dennis,
    This problem happens because of the way gluster handles 64-bit offsets introduced in ext4.

Pranith

cheers, 
:-Dennis

On 12 Nov 2014, at 13:22 , Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

n Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:41:17 AM you wrote:
I have seen weirdness with ext4 and replicated volumes, see thread
"[Gluster-devel] Duplicate entries and other weirdness in a 3*4 volume" 
started at 17 July.
Interesting, thanks.
It is a bug in gluster and http://review.gluster.com/#/c/8201/ is the fix for it.
Some more information about this bug: Only 3.6.1 release is affected by this issue. Except that release no other release has this problem. I was under the impression that this patch was already merged. This patch will definitely be there for 3.6.2. I am sorry for the slippage :'-(


_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux