|
CC one of the xfs devs Brian Foster. Pranith On 11/12/2014 03:21 AM, Lindsay
Mathieson wrote:
Just wondering about the usecases. In all my testing ext4 has been consistently faster for sustained and random read/writes on large files (VM images). Tested with/without external ssd journals and caches. nb. While you can use a external journal with xfs I found the support and tools for it too marginal to risk using. Unable to move, resize or remove the journal without manually editing the partition bytes, whereas ext4 has tune2fs for all of that. Plus builtin support for loading the journal via label or uuid. thanks, |
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
