On 2014-10-28 17:30, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:42:00AM -0400, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: >> On 10/28/2014 07:48 AM, Darshan Narayana Murthy wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Installation of glusterfs-3.6beta with vdsm (vdsm-4.14.8.1-0.fc19.x86_64) fails on >>> f19 & f20 because of dependency issues with qemu packages. >>> >>> I installed vdsm-4.14.8.1-0.fc19.x86_64 which installs glusterfs-3.5.2-1.fc19.x86_64 >>> as dependency. Now when I try to update glusterfs by downloading rpms from : >>> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/3.6.0beta3/Fedora/fedora-19/ >>> It fails with following error: >>> >>> Error: Package: 2:qemu-system-lm32-1.4.2-15.fc19.x86_64 (@updates) >>> Requires: libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) >>> Removing: glusterfs-api-3.5.2-1.fc19.x86_64 (@updates) >>> libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) >>> Updated By: glusterfs-api-3.6.0-0.5.beta3.fc19.x86_64 (/glusterfs-api-3.6.0-0.5.beta3.fc19.x86_64) >>> ~libgfapi.so.7()(64bit) >>> Available: glusterfs-api-3.4.0-0.5.beta2.fc19.x86_64 (fedora) >>> libgfapi.so.0()(64bit) >>> >>> Full output at: http://ur1.ca/ikvk8 >>> >>> For having snapshot and geo-rep management through ovirt, we need glusterfs-3.6 to be >>> installed with vdsm, which is currently failing. >>> >>> Can you please provide your suggestions to resolve this issue. >> >> Hi, >> >> Starting in 3.6 we have bumped the SO_VERSION of libgfapi. >> >> You need to install glusterfs-api-devel-3.6.0... first and build vdsm. >> >> But.... we are (or were) not planning to release glusterfs-3.6.0 on f19 and >> f20... >> >> Off hand I don't believe there's anything in glusterfs-api-3.6.0 that vdsm >> needs. vdsm with glusterfs-3.5.x on f19 and f20 should be okay. >> >> Is there something new in vdsm-4-14 that really needs glusterfs-3.6? If so >> we can revisit whether we release 3.6 to fedora 19 and 20. > > The chain of dependencies is like this: > > vdsm -> qemu -> libgfapi.so.0 > > I think a rebuild of QEMU should be sufficient. I'm planning to put > glusterfs-3.6 and rebuilds of related packages in a Fedora COPR. This > would make it possible for Fedora users to move to 3.6 before they > switch to Fedora 22. AFAICT the only difference between libgfapi.so.0 and libgfapi.so.7 are two added synbols (glfs_get_volfile, glfs_h_access) and __THROW on functions. Wouldn't it be possible to provide a compatibilty libgfapi.so.0 to ease migration? > > When more details become available, I'll let this list know. > > Cheers, > Niels > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > /Anders -- Anders Blomdell Email: anders.blomdell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Department of Automatic Control Lund University Phone: +46 46 222 4625 P.O. Box 118 Fax: +46 46 138118 SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
