----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gene Liverman" <gliverma@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Jean R. Franco" <jfranco@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "gluster-users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 7:22:14 AM > Subject: Re: Jumbo frames > > > > Personally, I think all replication benefits from a 9000 MTU. Bigger frame > equals faster replication. Yep, setting jumbo frames one of the easiest and biggest perf gains you can tune with glusterfs. I don't have any data handy for 1GB NICs but here is something on 10G: http://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/england-rhs-performance.pdf -b > -- > Gene Liverman > Systems Administrator > Information Technology Services > University of West Georgia > gliverma@xxxxxxxxxx > > > ITS: Making Technology Work for You! > > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender > immediately by return mail, delete this message, and destroy any copies. Any > dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended > recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal or actionable by law. > On Oct 21, 2014 6:26 AM, "Jean R. Franco" < jfranco@xxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > We're using Huawei's S5300 manageable switches in our deployment. > Would we benefit from higher size jumbo frames? > Right now it's set at 1600. > > Many thanks, > > Jean > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
