Thanks a lot.
2014-10-16 21:08 GMT+08:00 Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On 10/15/2014 09:00 PM, Zhou Ganhong wrote:
Hi, all
I am confused by the License used by the GlusterFS. There are different
descriptions in the web site. Which one is correct? Thanks a lot.
The community web site is maintained by volunteers. It is often out of date.
The one in the source is the only one you need to consider. It is the dual license GPLv2 or LGPLv3+. _Everything_ in GlusterFS is covered by the dual license.
--
Kaleb
Here is the link that claims that AGPL is appled.
http://www.gluster.org/documentation/community/GNU_Affero_General_Public_License/
But In these links,
http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Developers and
https://forge.gluster.org/glusterfs-core/pages/Home, the below is
mentioned. It seems that the client library is Dual License.
License Change
<http://www.gluster.org/2012/05/glusterfs-license-change/> - we recently
changed the client library code to a dual license under the GPL v2 and
the LGPL v3 or later
// Gulf
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
