On Sep 30, 2014 5:00 AM, "Justin Clift" <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 25/09/2014, at 7:53 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
> <snip>
> > Wanted to check if anyone out here uses BTRFS (and willing to share their experiences[1]) as the backend filesystem for GlusterFS. We're planning to explore some of it's features and put it to use for GlusterFS. This was discussed briefly during the weekly meeting on #gluster-meeting[2].
>
>
> In last week's GlusterFS Community Meeting, I volunteered to get a
> VM up and running in Rackspace so people could start getting btrfs
> testing happening.
>
> The requested OS was Fedora 21 (alpha) as it has newer versions of
> stuff than in Fedora 20.
>
> However, I'm having some real problems getting F21 up and running
> in Rackspace. In a local VM on my desktop, no issue. In Rackspace
> though, it never (ever) comes back from the reboot after the
> upgrade. (suspecting due to the PVHVM nature of the VM maybe)
>
> How critical is it for this to be F21 instead of F20? If it's
> really important, then I'll start getting really creative to get
> F21 on there. But it's likely to be a bit of a time suck with
> experimentation.
Not critical at all. F20 should suffice.
>
> Or would F20 (extremely easy to do) be good enough for now?
Absolutely. Please go ahead with F20.
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
> --
> GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
>
> An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
> petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
>
> My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
