Re: CentOS 7: Gluster Test Framework testcases failure

[Kiran Patil <kirantpatil@xxxxxxxxx>]

Now on XFS, the Test Summary Report is same as running on ZFS except test case bug-953887.t failure.

Test case tests/bugs/bug-953887.t expects force at end of line, TEST gluster volume add-brick $V0 $H0:$B0/${V0}{2,3} and it passed once force is substituted at the end of the line.

Test case tests/bugs/bug-767095.t failed due to path issue and now it no more fails.

So the failures are no more specific to on disk filesystems such as ZFS and XFS but glusterfs.

Thanks,
Kiran.

On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Kiran Patil <kirantpatil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I ran each testcases with DEBUG=1 and pasted at http://ur1.ca/i8xay (http://fpaste.org/136940/)

This time I ran the testcases by keeping default paths and now tests/bugs/bug-861542.t passes

Need to create /var/run/gluster directory on reboot

Test Setup:
---------------------

CentOS 7 : 3.10.0-123.8.1.el7.x86_64

gluster --version : glusterfs 3.4.5 built on Jul 24 2014 19:14:13

Zfs : zfs-0.6.3

glusterfs testcases version :
git branch : * (detached from v3.4.5)

Test Summary Report
-------------------
./tests/bugs/bug-802417.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 39 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  28, 31
./tests/bugs/bug-821056.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 21 Failed: 1)
  Failed test:  15
./tests/bugs/bug-908146.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  8-9
./tests/bugs/bug-913555.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 11 Failed: 4)
  Failed tests:  4-6, 9
./tests/bugs/bug-948686.t                       (Wstat: 0 Tests: 19 Failed: 8)
  Failed tests:  5-7, 9, 11, 13-15
./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729-force.t      (Wstat: 0 Tests: 35 Failed: 6)
  Failed tests:  29-31, 33-35
./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729-mode-script.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 35 Failed: 6)
  Failed tests:  29-31, 33-35
./tests/bugs/bug-948729/bug-948729.t            (Wstat: 0 Tests: 23 Failed: 2)
  Failed tests:  19, 23
Files=123, Tests=2019, 4834 wallclock secs ( 1.62 usr  0.25 sys + 258.83 cusr 201.05 csys = 461.75 CPU)
Result: FAIL

Thanks,
Kiran.

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 09/26/2014 02:59 AM, Justin Clift wrote:

On 25/09/2014, at 9:28 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
<snip>

Have we published somewhere which distributions or OS versions we are running regression tests ? if not lets compile it and publish as this will help community to understand which os distributions are part of the regression testing.

The best we have so far is probably this:

   http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Using_the_Gluster_Test_Framework

Do we have plans to run regression on a variety of distributions? Not sure how difficult or complex it is to maintain.

The primary OS at the moment is CentOS 6.x (mainly due to it
being the primary OS for GlusterFS I think).

Manu and Harsha have been going through the regression tests
recently, making them more cross platform in order to run on
the BSDs.

This effort has also highlighted some interesting Linux
specific behaviour in the main GlusterFS code base, and led
to fixes there.

In short, we're all for running the regression tests on as
many distributions as possible.  If Community members want
to put VM's or something online (medium-long term), I'd be
happy to hook our Jenkins infrastructure up to them to
automatically run tests on them.

Is that kind of what you're asking? :)

Yup, I will try to get a CentOS 7 instance for running regression tests :)

-Lala

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users