Re: To GlusterFS or not...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> SSD has been considered but is not an option due to cost.  SAS has
> been considered but is not a option due to the relatively small sizes
> of the drives.  We are *rapidly* growing towards a PB of actual online
> storage.
> 
> We are exploring raid controllers with onboard SSD cache which may help.

We have had some pretty good results with those in the lab.  They're not
*always* beneficial, and getting the right SSD:disk ratio for your
workload might require some experimentation, but it's certainly a good
direction to explore.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux