Re: Bricks vs LVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mark, as far as I know LVM gives you mainly flexibility. For instance if you have a big RAID 5 volume, you can split it in smaller pieces and make bricks for different volumes instead of having just a big brick. If you want to keep things simple you can avoid LVM as long as you don't really need it.  

2014-09-19 9:51 GMT-03:00 Mark s2c <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
What would you say are the efficiencies of using LVM to upgrade and add capacity to the glusterFS and this increasing the size of the bricks? Does gluster need to do anything when bricks are increased in size suddenly?

Or should I really be not using LVM and adding more bricks explicitly?

Just been thinking about this slide deck
http://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/black_w_1650_red_hat_storage_server_administration_deep_dive1.pdf

And why LVM is optional - I want to simplify my grid as much as poss.

Cheers Mark
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



--
Pavlik Salles Juan José
Blog - http://viviendolared.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux