Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for GlusterD-2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/11/2014 08:55 PM, James wrote:
I disagree. I think puppet + puppet-gluster would be a good idea:)
One advantage is that the technology is already proven, and there's a
working POC.
Feel free to prove me wrong, or to request any features that it's missing.;)

Are you the maintainer of puppet-gluster??
Is it compatible with ubuntu?

Eliezer
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux