That's disappointing. I can certainly understand wanting to keep dependencies small, but that sounds like FUD more than a reasoned argument. I do not envy your position navigating such waters. On Sep 8, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Is there any reason not to consider zookeeper? > > I did bring up that idea a while ago. I'm no Java fan myself, but still > I was surprised by the vehemence of the reactions. To put it politely, > many seemed to consider the dependency on Java unacceptable for both > resource and security reasons. Some community members said that they'd > be forced to switch to another DFS if we went that way. It didn't seem > like a very promising direction to explore further. _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
