Re: Feedback and future plans for glusterfsiostat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/09/2014, at 7:18 AM, Marcus Bointon wrote:
> On 4 Sep 2014, at 06:25, Justin Clift <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> io-stats maintains statistics of a few operations performed on file
>>> along with the fd/inode. For directories, I don't see much statistics collected.
>>> One big gap in io-stats is that there is no interface to peek at a small subset
>>> of the entire statistics collected.
>> 
>> Sounds like a good idea to fix somehow. :)
> 
> Would it not be easier/better to pump data into something like influxdb, then graph it in something like http://grafana.org instead of building it as a standalone tool, since it's unlikely you want it in isolation, and would avoid a certain amount of wheel-reinventing.


Thanks for that link Marcus.  Hadn't come across InfluxDB nor Grafana
before.  Grafana looks a lot like Kibana (visually), which is a plus.

Kind of wondering if they might be a better backend for GlusterFlow
(instead of ElasticSearch + Kibana), if I ever get around to working
on that again. ;)

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux