I have mixed feelings on the use of RAID. If you don't use RAID on a machine that has eight drives, for instance, what happens if you lose one drive with something like LVM? As far as I know, that whole system would be rendered useless. Granted, when you're using Gluster, the client systems that are attached to the storage can use round robin DNS to find the next Gluster node with its data and not skip a beat. At least with RAID you can afford to lose a drive or even two. Still, I see your point. I too would like to not have to waste drives on a RAID set. I understand that Ceph recommends against the use of RAID and I don't know the official position with RAID and Gluster. Sent from my iPad
|
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users