Re: distributed+replica problem ,thanks

[Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>]

hi,
     I performed the same test:
This is the output on the mount:
root@pranithk-laptop - /mnt/r2
11:34:27 :) ⚡ ls -l
total 0
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test1
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test2
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test3
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test4
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test5
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test6
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test7
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test8
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test9

This is the output on bricks:
root@pranithk-laptop - /mnt/r2
11:34:29 :) ⚡ ls -l /home/gfs/r2_?
/home/gfs/r2_0:
total 0
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test1
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test2
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test4
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test5
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test8
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test9

/home/gfs/r2_1:
total 0
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test1
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test2
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test4
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test5
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test8
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test9

/home/gfs/r2_2:
total 0
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test3
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test6
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test7

/home/gfs/r2_3:
total 0
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test3
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test6
-rw-r--r--. 2 root root 0 Jul 22 11:34 test7

Could you also give the output on bricks and mount please.

Pranith

On 07/21/2014 06:23 PM, ABC-new wrote:

dear all:

         i used glusterfs version 3.5.1.

         the volume type is distributed+replica. while i touch test{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9},the first replica's filelist is test1,test2,test3,test4,test5,test6,test7,test8,test9.

‍

the second replica's file list is test3,test6,test7

‍

my question is why test3,test6,test7 appeared in the first replica's filelist and the second replica's filelist .it does not match the feature of the distributed volume type.

the volume info is ok:

# gluster volume info

 

Volume Name: dr

Type: Distributed-Replicate

Volume ID: 0ae73b53-28be-43d5-9b86-807f4b58373b

Status: Started

Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4

Transport-type: tcp

Bricks:

Brick1: 192.168.109.214:/home/dr

Brick2: 192.168.109.215:/home/dr

Brick3: 192.168.109.216:/home/dr

Brick4: 192.168.109.217:/home/dr‍

            while the volume type is only distributed, it works fine.

best&regards

thanks!!!

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users