Sorry I am in Australia Time Zone so had to call it a night. I checked the PIDs and none of them were valid. The UID 48 is Apache. apache:x:48:48:Apache:/var/www/html:/bin/bash A bit detail as to what I am trying to achieve with gluster. We have 2 web servers which has a folder image that has images that are uploaded by our customers. We are doing master-master replication on mysql, which is working fine. As we have LB configured, customer would land on any of the servers. If they add a product, the database syncs the information, its only the image folder that they upload images to needs to be synced between the servers, thus we looked into glusterfs. Gluster works fine, but the only thing that caught my eye was the bandwidth utilisation bumped up a little bit even when there were no file changes made on either of the server. I understand keep alive, but this looked a bit odd that we are seeing lookup calls for random files on the wire. First I thought it was just Gluster using the 200KB/s throughput, but last night I found out that its a combination of Gluster, mysql, LB. I switched off LB & mysql and found that Gluster is using around 30-40KB/s. At the moment we don’t have many files, but this raises scalability questions, what will happen when we reach 1000s of files in that directory. I don’t know how Apache is causing this. I have Ccd my dev team on this as well. Thanks for all your help. Regards, Gurdeep. On 8 Jul 2014, at 12:45 am, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users