I am not sure about how much it will help..
NFS has a basic advantage which is caching.
It will lower the network traffic that the GlusterFS adding when
mirroring but it will also lower the benefit from multiple servers files
read.
I myself would like to know the answer to the same issue.
I have tried with NFS and I know that there were couple good things it
did while I cannot promise the same for your scenario.
If you are up for the challenge to test it I am +1 to see the results.
Eliezer
On 07/02/2014 01:45 PM, MySystem 365 wrote:
Thanks Eliezer,
The size is about 600G. Do you think mounting with NFS on top of
GlusterFS instead of native gluster client will help?
-
Jack Marc
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
