Re: Link latency ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Okay, thanks.

I just had the opportunity to use two distant datacenters for geographic
failover. The expected delay between them (transatlantic) is 40ms.
I will stick to the 2ms links.

Cheers.

Le 20/06/2014 13:44, Vijay Bellur a écrit :
> On 06/20/2014 02:34 PM, Hoggins! wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>> I have two servers that I would like to use as bricks for GlusterFS
>> (replication).
>>
>> They are connected to each other via 1Gbps links, but with 40ms latency
>> (continental links).
>>
>> Do you think such a configuration is sustainable ?
>>
>
> The latency is quite high for synchronous replication. For
> geo-replication, this latency value is sustainable.
>
> -Vijay
>

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users





[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux