Re: Link latency ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



>The latency is quite high for synchronous replication. For
>geo-replication, this latency value is sustainable.
>
>-Vijay

Hi Vijay,

Do you think 15-20ms is OK for synchronous?

Thanks.

- --
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.1.1

iQJcBAEBCgBGBQJTpCOsPxxHYXZpbiBIZW5yeSAoU3VyZXRlYyBTeXN0ZW1zIEx0
ZC4pIDxnaGVucnlAc3VyZXRlY3N5c3RlbXMuY29tPgAKCRDct4pLjPuo5kQhEACA
dUnj1A8l1H7eh74B8qn9iWbNufHTItJeCJB1LYi8AqZbMgNS4kCSfNl+tWYlJ4Bw
+Zu6nOhvfvXhbEt7+s/dTt7unE/Ok49h+PjzuSkTjG+biPTtrrkwIEU7qFBssAxJ
CWutV9VO7jXdKK5qFSskuMlYalwR4KEeuzptIcp7ONIQIiHX/+Vg80S0s9qTte41
iJMXlYcFd1WUICaD738n1I7nwaQWwW09bT4j2vh7kK35V/IVJE3GCN+KVhVFxEa9
7dvdYTwCEdQSUcTwNiTcTZsW5MfvXNw4CwySzAKIFWA1NWJ5jMa86Auo7Pm5mj1/
1M8ojJhd/hJCSBs1VN5ceQjIaNeruQ8RECVXvzE9qbnOYw3Oo0wdJlXMzJJNOU7T
Fb3Qm7eg0eyu+7ZM5+WF00oc9B3ucmTEdeJe7QImIAguRNF3EjF1dGvPkIFRfZYv
hHLP11mSSEQsjB+g9EvSgRwLeIM7ZDutz1ANPn+bA7enDB+X3iN20w7fH81Oo8mK
X3Pvq6wOaUJL1pydGPGrmYnksecuUh32iXXzycTXe8KIArxEIxlEELRC7DLmIxP6
F4MZhN9C/X9X6P2HAGxdctBUd58FleSFvATrSU5QNdhfuz43hJqbYHX43Mpb4Ngn
32dlblnokBIcFXHxOEaS/OWa6purRpcpYCGVKuf7xA==
=KsVK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux