Re: tar_ssh.pem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > On April 28, 2014 6:03:16 AM PDT, Venky Shankar
> > <vshankar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> On 04/27/2014 11:55 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> >>> I'm new to Gluster but have successfully tried geo-rep with 3.5.0.
> >>> I've read about the new tar+ssh feature and it sounds good but
> >>> nothing has been said about the tar_ssh.pem file that gsyncd.conf
> >>> references. Why is a separate key needed? Does it not use gsyncd
> >>> on the other end? If not, what command should I lock it down to
> >>> in authorized_keys, bug #1091079 notwithstanding?

> >> geo-replication "create push-pem" command should add the keys on
> >> the slave for tar+ssh to work. That is done as part of geo-rep
> >> setup.

I had seen the new "create push-pem" option and gave it a try today. I
see that it does indeed create a different key with a different command
in the authorized_keys file.

One question remains though and this stems back to bug #1091079.
push-pem expects you to have setup passwordless SSH access already so
what is the point of adding further lines to authorized_keys when
general access is already allowed? Surely this is bad for security?
Wouldn't it be better for push-pem to prompt for a password so that
only the required access is added?

Regards,
James
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux