On 15 Apr 2014 18:15, Terada Michitaka <terrada3@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> To Liam:
>
> >I had about 100 million files in Gluster and it was unbelievably painfully slow. We had to ditch it for other technology.
>
> Has slow down occurred on writing file?, listing files, or both?
>
> In our application, path of the data is managed in database.
> "ls" is slow, but not influence to my application, but writing file slow down is critical.
Throughput with the fuse client is very good, as long as you access files directly you won't have any problems with slow directory reads. In my experience it's better than NFS, especially if you have many clients.
>
> >> To All:
>
> I uploaded a statistics when writing test(32kbyte x 10 million, 6 bricks).
>
> http://gss.iijgio.com/gluster/gfs-profile_d03r2.txt
>
> Line 15, average-latency value is about 30 ms.
> I cannot judge this value is a normal(ordinary?) performance or not.
>
> Is it slow?
>
> Thanks,
> --Michika Terada
>
>
>
>
> 2014-04-15 16:05 GMT+09:00 Franco Broi <franco.broi@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>
>> My bug report is here
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067256
>>
>> On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 23:51 -0700, Joe Julian wrote:
>> > If you experience pain using any filesystem, you should see your
>> > doctor.
>> >
>> > If you're not actually experiencing pain, perhaps you should avoid
>> > hyperbole and instead talk about what version you tried, what your
>> > tests were, how you tried to fix it, and what the results were.
>> >
>> > If you're using a current version with a kernel that has readdirplus
>> > support for fuse it shouldn't be that bad. If it is, file a bug report
>> > - especially if you have the skills to help diagnose the problem.
>> >
>> > On April 14, 2014 11:30:26 PM PDT, Liam Slusser <lslusser@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > I had about 100 million files in Gluster and it was
>> > unbelievably painfully slow. We had to ditch it for other
>> > technology.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Franco Broi
>> > <franco.broi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > I seriously doubt this is the right filesystem for
>> > you, we have problems
>> > listing directories with a few hundred files, never
>> > mind millions.
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 10:45 +0900, Terada Michitaka
>> > wrote:
>> > > Dear All,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I have a problem with slow writing when there are 10
>> > million files.
>> > > (Top level directories are 2,500.)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I configured GlusterFS distributed cluster(3 nodes).
>> > > Each node's spec is below.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > CPU: Xeon E5-2620 (2.00GHz 6 Core)
>> > > HDD: SATA 7200rpm 4TB*12 (RAID 6)
>> > > NW: 10GBEth
>> > > GlusterFS : glusterfs 3.4.2 built on Jan 3 2014
>> > 12:38:06
>> > >
>> > > This cluster(volume) is mounted on CentOS via FUSE
>> > client.
>> > > This volume is storage of our application and I want
>> > to store 3
>> > > hundred million to 5 billion files.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I performed a writing test, writing 32KByte file ×
>> > 10 million to this
>> > > volume, and encountered a problem.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > (1) Writing is so slow and slow down as number of
>> > files increases.
>> > > In non clustering situation(one node), this node's
>> > writing speed is
>> > > 40 MByte/sec at random,
>> > > But writing speed is 3.6MByte/sec on that cluster.
>> > > (2) ls command is very slow.
>> > > About 20 second. Directory creation takes about 10
>> > seconds at
>> > > lowest.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Question:
>> > >
>> > > 1)5 Billion files are possible to store in
>> > GlusterFS?
>> > > Has someone succeeded to store billion files to
>> > GlusterFS?
>> > >
>> > > 2) Could you give me a link for a tuning guide or
>> > some information of
>> > > tuning?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -- Michitaka Terada
>> >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Gluster-users mailing list
>> > > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >
>> > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Gluster-users mailing list
>> > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Gluster-users mailing list
>> > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>> >
>>
>>
>
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the original.
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
