On 04/10/2014 03:16 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: > On 04/02/2014 03:40 AM, Apostolos Manolitzas wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I just discovered the GlusterFS while looking for a solution for high >> availability on our NAND flashes. We use ubifs >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_file_system#Linux_flash_filesystems> >> and jffs2 >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_file_system#Linux_flash_filesystems> >> for filesystem and we would like to apply some high availability >> strategy to a part of the flash. So has anyone tested GlusterFS with >> this setup? Is it a viable solution or should we move to an upper >> layer solution? >> >> thanks for any opinion, >> >> -Apostolos > > I always start by asking what type of flash are you using - if you are > using PCI-e flash devices or S-ATA/SAS flash, there is no real reason > to use UBIFS or JFFS2 since the parts do wear levelling and so on > internally. > > For example, Google uses ext4 as their default file system for Android > phones and tablets. > > I don't know of anyone running gluster on raw flash backed file > systems (i.e., embedded systems) but that might be fun to try :) > > Ric > > > Hello, unfortunately we "live" in an embedded world with no parts to do the wear leveling, so we were forced to use the UBI-FS. Thanks for the answer, I think we have to do some tests in order to have a clear view. -Apostolos _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
