Gluster Interop vs Survey

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I like the survey idea.

Would something like an (semi) annual interop event make sense? Maybe
co-located with another major conference like SC or ISC, or Interop,
or whatever. A survey maybe sets an upper bound on what people are
trying (successfully??), an interop test event *maybe* sets a lower
bound on what is known to work well. It could point out weaknesses in
switching vs memory caching vs random write io latency vs scsi queue
depth, etc.

Just brainstorming a little here... distributed systems are complex
enough, but distributed *storage* just seems to make standard
regression testing all the more difficult. The survey to me is a poor
mans regression of sorts.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux