Hi Lucian, but Glusterfs is at least trying to replicate the QEMU image onto the other node ? That's the whole point of the replication isn’t it ? Thanks for the help, Dan > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:29:30 +0700 > From: Daniel Baker <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Does QEMU offer High Availability > Message-ID: <5326F8BA.7010300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > HI all, > > If I use QEMU in Glusterfs 3.4.2 can I achieve true High Availability. > > If I have two nodes that are clustering a QEMU image and one of them > goes down will the other QEMU image take its place. > > Can I really achieve that ? > > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:48:45 +0000 > From: Nux! <nux@xxxxxxxxx> > To: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Does QEMU offer High Availability > Message-ID: <c5ba49ac0de0faf0ab1257a7f1800f31@xxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > On 17.03.2014 13:29, Daniel Baker wrote: >> HI all, >> >> If I use QEMU in Glusterfs 3.4.2 can I achieve true High Availability. >> >> If I have two nodes that are clustering a QEMU image and one of them >> goes down will the other QEMU image take its place. >> >> Can I really achieve that ? > > Dan, > > This is not really a discussion for the gluster lists. > > You should ask KVM people, but to answer you briefly: > - No, KVM is just a hypervisor, it runs virtual machines and that's all > it does. > You need to run additional RedHat clustering stuff around it to achieve > HA. > > HTH > Lucian > _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
