Begin forwarded message: From: bernhard glomm <bernhard.glomm@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Gluster Volume Replication using 2 AWS instances on Autoscaling Date: March 13, 2014 6:08:10 PM GMT+01:00 To: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> ??? I thought replace-brick was not recommended at the moment in 3.4.2 on a replica 2 volume I use successfully: volume remove-brick <vol-name> replica 1 <brick-name> force # replace the old brick with the new one, mount another disk or what ever, than volume add-brick <vol-name> replica 2 <brick-name> force volume heal <vol-name> hth Bernhard On Mar 13, 2014, at 5:48 PM, Vijay Bellur <vbellur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On 03/13/2014 09:18 AM, Alejandro Planas wrote: Hello, You can probably use: volume replace-brick <volname> <old-brick> <new-brick> commit force This will remove the old-brick from the volume and bring in new-brick to the volume. self-healing can then synchronize data to the new brick. Regards, Vijay _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users