Anybody can confirm/dispute that this is normal/abnormal? v On Tue 25 Feb 2014 15:21:40, Viktor Villafuerte wrote: > Hi all, > > I have distributed replicated set with 2 servers (replicas) and am > trying to add another set of replicas: 1 x (1x1) => 2 x (1x1) > > I have about 23G of data which I copy onto the first replica, check > everything and then add the other set of replicas and eventually > rebalance fix-layout, migrate-data. > > Now on > > Gluster v3.2.5 this took about 30 mins (to rebalance + migrate-data) > > on > > Gluster v3.4.2 this has been running for almost 4 hours and it's still > not finished > > > As I may have to do this in production, where the amount of data is > significantly larger than 23G, I'm looking at about three weeks of wait > to rebalance :) > > Now my question is if this is as it's meant to be? I can see that v3.4.2 > gives me more info about the rebalance process etc, but that surely > cannot justify the enormous time difference. > > Is this normal/expected behaviour? If so I will have to stick with the > v3.2.5 as it seems way quicker. > > Please, let me know if there is any 'well known' option/way/secret to > speed the rebalance up on v3.4.2. > > > thanks > > > > -- > Regards > > Viktor Villafuerte > Optus Internet Engineering > t: 02 808-25265 > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Regards Viktor Villafuerte Optus Internet Engineering t: 02 808-25265 _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users