-I think you will run into the fact that tables are blocks on disk. I have no idea how gluster would handle a table bigger than a brick? Probably it means all your reads will be non-local unless you happen to be on the server that has the brick for the file.
-But then again, with a clever slave configuration, maybe there is a way to leverage gluster for durability as well as the local file system for other tasks?
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Targino Silveira <targinosilveira@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Suvendu,I have used Gluster to store old data in PostgreSQL database, the access for this data was very good, but was old data, the recent data was store in SAS Disk because permance.Regards,2014-02-11 3:57 GMT-02:00 Suvendu Mitra <suvendu.mitra@xxxxxxxxx>:Hi,We are planning to run glusterfs on openstack based VM cluster, I understood that gluster replication is based on file level. What is the drawback of running RDBMS on gluster
--
Suvendu Mitra
GSM - +358504821066_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Jay Vyas
http://jayunit100.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
