----- Original Message ----- > > > > Probably by the end of today or so I'll be releasing the long > > requested "Automatic GlusterFS deployments". I'd recommend against > > offering up static iso's, since this solution is a lot nicer, and a > > lot less bandwidth heavy for downloads. You can set how many hosts to > > build, and so on, all from one base image and my scripts. If you > > really want iso's, you can use this system to save them and put them > > up for download. > > > > I don't know if i can agree - your work is completely okay to co-exist > with an ISO. But there is a problem here with version numbers for > GlusterFS. Er... that's a separate issue from what james is saying. > > GlusterFS in community versions are 3.4.x (i.e there are releases > based on minor version changes) as we did > > 3.4.0, 3.4.1, 3.4.2 releases ... and so on. > > Red Hat Storage Server version is based on point releases ie. pick a > release/standardize and then back port patches. > > 3.4.0.33, 3.4.0.44 .. releases and so on. If there is demand for this, we'll have to figure out how to avoid namespace collisions, because as you mentioned, it will be confusing. -JM _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
