----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrew Lau" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Ben Turner" <bturner@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx List" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 5:03:36 AM > Subject: Re: Gluster infrastructure question > > Hi Ben, > > For glusterfs would you recommend the enterprise-storage > or throughput-performance tuned profile? I usually use rhs-high-throughput. I am not sure which versions of tuned have this profile but I am running tuned-0.2.19-11.el6.1.noarch, I am pretty sure you can grab the srpm here: http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/ HTH, -b > Thanks, > Andrew > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Ben Turner <bturner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Ben Turner" <bturner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: "Heiko Krämer" <hkraemer@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: "gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx List" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 2:26:45 PM > > > Subject: Re: Gluster infrastructure question > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Heiko Krämer" <hkraemer@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > To: "gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx List" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 8:18:28 AM > > > > Subject: Gluster infrastructure question > > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > Heyho guys, > > > > > > > > I'm running since years glusterfs in a small environment without big > > > > problems. > > > > > > > > Now I'm going to use glusterFS for a bigger cluster but I've some > > > > questions :) > > > > > > > > Environment: > > > > * 4 Servers > > > > * 20 x 2TB HDD, each > > > > * Raidcontroller > > > > * Raid 10 > > > > * 4x bricks => Replicated, Distributed volume > > > > * Gluster 3.4 > > > > > > > > 1) > > > > I'm asking me, if I can delete the raid10 on each server and create > > > > for each HDD a separate brick. > > > > In this case have a volume 80 Bricks so 4 Server x 20 HDD's. Is there > > > > any experience about the write throughput in a production system with > > > > many of bricks like in this case? In addition i'll get double of HDD > > > > capacity. > > > > > > Have a look at: > > > > > > http://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/england-rhs-performance.pdf > > > > That one was from 2012, here is the latest: > > > > > > http://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/england_th_0450_rhs_perf_practices-4_neependra.pdf > > > > -b > > > > > Specifically: > > > > > > ● RAID arrays > > > ● More RAID LUNs for better concurrency > > > ● For RAID6, 256-KB stripe size > > > > > > I use a single RAID 6 that is divided into several LUNs for my bricks. > > For > > > example, on my Dell servers(with PERC6 RAID controllers) each server has > > 12 > > > disks that I put into raid 6. Then I break the RAID 6 into 6 LUNs and > > > create a new PV/VG/LV for each brick. From there I follow the > > > recommendations listed in the presentation. > > > > > > HTH! > > > > > > -b > > > > > > > 2) > > > > I've heard a talk about glusterFS and out scaling. The main point was > > > > if more bricks are in use, the scale out process will take a long > > > > time. The problem was/is the Hash-Algo. So I'm asking me how is it if > > > > I've one very big brick (Raid10 20TB on each server) or I've much more > > > > bricks, what's faster and is there any issues? > > > > Is there any experiences ? > > > > > > > > 3) > > > > Failover of a HDD is for a raid controller with HotSpare HDD not a big > > > > deal. Glusterfs will rebuild automatically if a brick fails and there > > > > are no data present, this action will perform a lot of network traffic > > > > between the mirror bricks but it will handle it equal as the raid > > > > controller right ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and cheers > > > > Heiko > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - -- > > > > Anynines.com > > > > > > > > Avarteq GmbH > > > > B.Sc. Informatik > > > > Heiko Krämer > > > > CIO > > > > Twitter: @anynines > > > > > > > > - ---- > > > > Geschäftsführer: Alexander Faißt, Dipl.-Inf.(FH) Julian Fischer > > > > Handelsregister: AG Saarbrücken HRB 17413, Ust-IdNr.: DE262633168 > > > > Sitz: Saarbrücken > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) > > > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > > > > > > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSpcMfAAoJELxFogM4ixOF/ncH/3L9DvOWHrF0XBqCgeT6QQ6B > > > > lDwtXiD9xoznht0Zs2S9LA9Z7r2l5/fzMOUSOawEMv6M16Guwq3gQ1lClUi4Iwj0 > > > > GKKtYQ6F4aG4KXHY4dlu1QKT5OaLk8ljCQ47Tc9aAiJMhfC1/IgQXOslFv26utdJ > > > > N9jxiCl2+r/tQvQRw6mA4KAuPYPwOV+hMtkwfrM4UsIYGGbkNPnz1oqmBsfGdSOs > > > > TJh6+lQRD9KYw72q3I9G6ZYlI7ylL9Q7vjTroVKH232pLo4G58NLxyvWvcOB9yK6 > > > > Bpf/gRMxFNKA75eW5EJYeZ6EovwcyCAv7iAm+xNKhzsoZqbBbTOJxS5zKm4YWoY= > > > > =bDly > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Gluster-users mailing list > > > > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gluster-users mailing list > > > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
