Thanks Marcus. I understand ... The Native Gluster client have very poor performance ... If i use NFS i could mount on an IPFailover. If one of the fileserver is down, the IPfailover switch one the second Fileserver (not managed by Gluster Client but the only the network). Next test, i will install debian-zfs package and try to use this filesystem with GlusterFS. -----Message initial----- De: Marcus Bointon?<marcus at synchromedia.co.uk> Envoy?: vendredi 27 septembre 2013 16:06 ?: Gluster-users at gluster.org List <gluster-users at gluster.org> Sujet: Re: Cluster with NFS On 27 Sep 2013, at 15:49, DUBOURG Kevin <kevin at dubourg.info <mailto:kevin at dubourg.info> > wrote: An idiot question ... I would like to use NFS on my client instead of the Native Gluster Client. If i do that, i can not able to use the cluster functionnality ? I think that the date will be duplicated between the fileserver 1 and the fileserver2, but on my client i can specify only one fileserver ... I'm wrong ? If you use NFS, you can indeed only connect to one server, but it doesn't matter which one - the client has nothing to do with replicating of data between the servers. Because NFS doesn't know about gluster, you lose automatic failover when doing this. Roughly speaking these are your tradeoffs for clients: gluster client: good: auto failover bad: complex client setup poor performance NFS client: good: simple client setup better performance bad: No failover. Marcus _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users at gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130927/134f8243/attachment.html>
