How are you testing this? What tool are you using? Avati On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 9:02 PM, kane <stef_9k at 163.com> wrote: > Hi Vijay > > I used the code in https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs.git with > the lasted commit: > commit de2a8d303311bd600cb93a775bc79a0edea1ee1a > Author: Anand Avati <avati at redhat.com> > Date: Tue Sep 17 16:45:03 2013 -0700 > > Revert "cluster/distribute: Rebalance should also verify free inodes" > > This reverts commit 215fea41a96479312a5ab8783c13b30ab9fe00fa > > Realized soon after merging, ?. > > which include the patch you mentioned last time improve read perf, written > by Anand. > > but the read perf was still slow: > write: 500MB/s > read: 77MB/s > > while via fuse : > write 800MB/s > read 600MB/s > > any advises? > > > Thank you. > -Kane > > ? 2013-9-13???10:37?kane <stef_9k at 163.com> ??? > > > Hi Vijay? > > > > thank you for post this message, i will try it soon > > > > -kane > > > > > > > > ? 2013-9-13???9:21?Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> ??? > > > >> On 09/13/2013 06:10 PM, kane wrote: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> We use gluster samba vfs test io,but the read performance via vfs is > >>> half of write perfomance, > >>> but via fuse the read and write performance is almost the same. > >>> > >>> this is our smb.conf: > >>> [global] > >>> workgroup = MYGROUP > >>> server string = DCS Samba Server > >>> log file = /var/log/samba/log.vfs > >>> max log size = 500000 > >>> # use sendfile = true > >>> aio read size = 262144 > >>> aio write size = 262144 > >>> aio write behind = true > >>> min receivefile size = 262144 > >>> write cache size = 268435456 > >>> security = user > >>> passdb backend = tdbsam > >>> load printers = yes > >>> cups options = raw > >>> read raw = yes > >>> write raw = yes > >>> max xmit = 262144 > >>> socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=262144 > >>> SO_SNDBUF=262144 > >>> kernel oplocks = no > >>> stat cache = no > >>> > >>> any advises helpful? > >>> > >> > >> This patch has shown improvement in read performance with libgfapi: > >> > >> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5897/ > >> > >> Would it be possible for you to try this patch and check if it improves > performance in your case? > >> > >> -Vijay > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130917/98115dbd/attachment.html>
