Possible memory leak ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi,
   We meet memory leak in 3.4.0 & sambavfs. 
   With mounting cifs, our application runs,'VIRT' of smbd process will increase untill oom-kill. 
using 'fsync/sync' or 'echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' can't resolve it. With mounting fuse, no memory leaks.

   I guess fuse API or samba-gluster-vfs  has bug, any advise?
   Thanks,

-terrs 

> I'm aware of 2 different kinds of memory leaks on 3.3.1, one is in
> geo-replication and another one is native client side memory leak.
> Sadly both got mixed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841617
> 
> I can tell you that geo-replication leak is still present in 3.4.0 and
> native client leak isn't but I don't know what patch you need to backport :(
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:16 PM, John Ewing <johnewing1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using gluster 3.3.1 on Centos 6, installed from
> > the glusterfs-3.3.1-1.el6.x86_64.rpm rpms.
> > I am seeing the Committed_AS memory continually increasing and the
> > processes  using the memory are glusterfsd instances.
> >
> > see http://imgur.com/K3dalTW for graph.
> >
> > Both nodes are exhibiting the same behaviour, I have tried the suggested
> >
> > echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> >
> > but it made no difference. It there a known issue with 3.3.1 ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users at gluster.org
> > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux