Nobody? Met vriendelijke groeten, * Fred van Zwieten * *Enterprise Open Source Services* * Consultant* *(woensdags afwezig)* *VX Company IT Services B.V.* *T* (035) 539 09 50 mobiel (06) 41 68 28 48 *F* (035) 539 09 08 *E* fvzwieten at vxcompany.com *I* www.vxcompany.com Seeing, contrary to popular wisdom, isn?t believing. It?s where belief stops, because it isn?t needed any more.. (Terry Pratchett) On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Fred van Zwieten <fvzwieten at vxcompany.com>wrote: > Hi, > >> >> I have a question. I am on RHS 2.0 Update 4 (will soon go to 2.1 when >> it's out) and I have a distributed volume (across 7 nodes) where a fair >> amount of directory moves take place (or directory renames). AFAIK this >> will most likely give new hash values and so all data needs to be moved >> around the pool. Gluster does not do this immediately, but instead creates >> a link from the new location to the old location. >> >> Questions: >> 1. Is there a gluster command to investigate the amount of these links >> (How "dirty" is my volume) >> 2. What command to I use to fix this. I think a "simple" rebalance would >> do it. >> >> I would like to create a cron job that checks the amount of links and, if >> above a certain level, it will do a rebalance. Alternatively I could do a >> fixed periodic rebalance. And I have as yet no idea on what level (what >> amount of found links) a rebalance is necessary. >> >> Any thoughts, hints, etc? >> >> Fred >> >> Seeing, contrary to popular wisdom, isn?t believing. It?s where belief >> stops, because it isn?t needed any more.. (Terry Pratchett) >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130904/dddd7127/attachment.html>
