On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Marcus Bointon <marcus at synchromedia.co.uk>wrote: > On 27 Nov 2013, at 09:30, lei yang <yanglei.fage at gmail.com> wrote: > > I have a machine which have 5 hard disk > > I want to use glusterfs to fast my disk > > > You do know that gluster is not about single-node performance? You'll get > far better performance by using RAID 0/1/5/10 on your local machine. > Gluster gives you multiple machine redundancy (like RAID, but spread across > multiple machines), and size scalability beyond what you can fit in one box. > > root at ovpovp-S2600CP:/mnt/lyang0# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1000M count=10 of=./1G > 10+0 records in > 10+0 records out > 10485760000 bytes (10 GB) copied, 55.5562 s, 189 MB/s > > > From a single node that looks reasonable for gluster. You'd probably get > 3-4 times that with native local access. > > but the truth is it's much worse than use my native harddisk, that's is why I post my question, any setting is wrong with me ? Lei > Marcus > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20131128/1845a3e6/attachment.html>
