Hi All, I am interested in some feedback on putting multiple bricks on one physical disk. Each brick being assigned to a different volume. Here is the scenario: 4 disks per server, 4 servers, 2x2 distribute/replicate I would prefer to have just one volume but need to do geo-replication on some of the data (but not all of it). My thought was to use two volumes, which would allow me to selectively geo-replicate just the data that I need to, by replicating only one volume. A couple of questions come to mind: 1) Any implications of doing two bricks for different volumes on one physical disk? 2) Will the "free space" across each volume still calculate correctly? IE, if one volume takes up 2/3 of the total physical disk space, will the second volume still reflect the correct amount of used space? 3) Am I being stupid/missing something obvious? Cheers, Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20131112/5e2aa992/attachment.html>
