Thanks for your reply. No matter how many nodes (currently the volume is only with its own node) the speed is really slow. For testing purposes, i made a volume with only one node, without any replication - however the speed is still ~500kb/s. The cloud servers are limited to 30Gbit/s but still the traffic when writing to the node is ~500kb/s i'm using 3.3.1 glusterfsd with kernel 2.6.18-348.el5xen and i need to know if the the problem is within the kernel. --- Find out about our new Cloud service - Cloudware.bg <http://cloudware.bg/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=link&utm_campaign=newwebsite> Access anywhere. Manage it yourself. Pay as you go. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Yavor Marinov* System Administrator Neterra Ltd. Telephone: +359 2 975 16 16 Fax: +359 2 975 34 36 Mobile: +359 888 610 048 www.neterra.net <http://www.neterra.net> On 05/23/2013 11:36 AM, Nux! wrote: > On 23.05.2013 08:38, ???? ??????? wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to setup GlusterFS with 2 nodes, but it seems that speed >> is really low. The 3 nodes are based on a cloud service, i'm using 2 >> for bricks, and 1 for a client, where the volume is mounted. The >> operating system is CentOS 5.9 x64, and actual problem is that the >> write speed when a copy of file is performed on the client side >> mounted dir, is not going over 500kbytes/sec. Anyone have any >> suggestion where to dig further in order to locate the problem? > > Hello Yavor, > > What kind of setup? Replicated? > With 2 node replicated setups the speed from a 3rd mount point would > essentially be 2x slower than with only 1 node, so the question is > what kind of speed do you get between your nodes? > Is any of them limited to 10 Mbps by any chance? > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130523/e5bd1042/attachment.html>
