Disappointing documentation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> No, that pdf's done in docbook and there's no clean conversion to
> mediawiki. Someone was copy-pasting (often with errors) from the pdf
> into the wiki.
> 
> Somewhere along the way, the decision was made to only have an
> un-editable pdf as the only form of documentation provided by Gluster
> during the transition from their own company to being owned by Red
> Hat.
> I've fought and complained ever since. That's why I'm trying to start
> converting it to asciidoc and having it hosted outside the source
> tree.
> Not only, then, can there be a pdf, but other formats are easily
> accessible from there as well and we can all participate.

Agreed. It's something we have to fix. This will be on the agenda for Friday, when we discuss documentation:

http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Planning/Community_Summit

-JM


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux