On 06/25/2013 06:22 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > On 06/25/2013 09:05 AM, Tamas Papp wrote: >> On 06/25/2013 05:20 PM, Chiku wrote: >>> >>> Hello >>> >>> I have 2 gluster servers (10.0.1.11 and 10.0.1.12) and 1 client(10.0.1.1) on same lan. >>> I added a direct network link between the 2 servers (10.10.10.11 and 10.10.10.12). >>> >>> From 1 gluster server : >>> >>> $ sudo gluster peer probe 10.10.10.12 >>> >>> $ sudo gluster peer status >>> Number of Peers: 1 >>> >>> Hostname: 10.10.10.12 >>> Uuid: 467b70c7-c5b5-48c3-9026-4a2b3eadc5b8 >>> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) >>> >>> $ sudo gluster volume create VOL_REPL2 replica 2 transport tcp 10.10.10.11:/opt/data/b2 >>> 10.10.10.12:/opt/data/b2 >>> >>> $ sudo gluster volume info >>> >>> Volume Name: VOL_REPL2 >>> Type: Replicate >>> Volume ID: 65db00ee-5d64-490b-8f37-47d918f20062 >>> Status: Started >>> Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2 >>> Transport-type: tcp >>> Bricks: >>> Brick1: 10.10.10.11:/opt/data/b2 >>> Brick2: 10.10.10.12:/opt/data/b2 >>> >>> From my client : >>> $ sudo mount -t glusterfs 10.0.1.11:/VOL_REPL2 /mnt/VOL_REPL2 >>> Mount failed. Please check the log file for more details. >>> >>> >>> $ sudo less /var/log/glusterfs/mnt-VOL_REPL1.log >>> ... >>> [2013-06-25 16:53:15.419615] E [socket.c:1715:socket_connect_finish] 0-VOL_REPL2-client-0: >>> connection to failed (Connection refused) >>> [2013-06-25 16:53:15.419781] E [socket.c:1715:socket_connect_finish] 0-VOL_REPL2-client-1: >>> connection to failed (Connection refused) >>> ... >>> >>> $ sudo mount -t nfs 10.0.1.11:/VOL_REPL2 /mnt/VOL_REPL2 >>> That works fine. >>> But why I can't mount with glusterfs ? >> >> Try this on client: >> >> $ ip ro add 10.10.10.11 via 10.0.1.11 >> $ ip ro add 10.10.10.12 via 10.0.1.12 >> $ mount -t glusterfs 10.10.10.11:/VOL_REPL2 /mnt/VOL_REPL2 >> > To expand on that a little, the native client always connects directly to the bricks as defined in > the volume definition. If you need a different route path, that's a networking problem at that > point, or you can use hostnames and split-horizon dns. BTW, is it worth using a separated network for the cluster? tamas
