Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]
From: jdarcy at redhat.com (Jeff Darcy)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 14:04:58 -0400
In-reply-to: <51DD79A5.3060506@flexsys-group.de>

On 07/10/2013 11:11 AM, Allan Latham wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong but geo-replication is master/slave?

It is, today.  Multi-way is under development, but by its nature won't ever
have the same consistency guarantees as synchronous replication.

References:
- read-subvolume
  - From: Allan Latham
- read-subvolume
  - From: Allan Latham
- Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]
  - From: Allan Latham
- Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]
  - From: Jeff Darcy
- Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]
  - From: Allan Latham
- Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]
  - From: Jeff Darcy
- Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]
  - From: Allan Latham

Prev by Date: Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]
Next by Date: Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]
Previous by thread: Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]
Next by thread: Giving up [ was: Re: read-subvolume]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Development] [Linux Filesytems Development] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux