On 07/04/2013 02:47 AM, Justin Clift wrote: > On 03/07/2013, at 4:31 PM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: > <snip> >> No, but I wouldn't worry about it. The latest results from our performance engineering team show that the default values are generally the best choice. >> >> OTOH, you should mount with inode64 mount option. > > Interesting. It's probably worth us creating an FAQ entry somewhere on the wiki, > recommending good sets of mount options to suit various scenarios. > > I can write that up. Just need to know what to put in it. > > For "inode64", when should people use it? "always"? :D Yes, always. Perhaps not necessary on small volumes, e.g. < 250GB. > > Do you have a general set of favourite options you use, that I can start with? > That's it. -- Kaleb
