I didn't see anything in the paper that mentioned the specs on your load generating clients? Where can I get your test scripts for the structured filesystem tests other than specsfs2k8? I assume you used distributed + replicated with gluster? Is compuverde using a similar algorithm or is it striping files? You mentioned using NFS/CIFS. NFS & CIFS can have different performance characteristics so were the graph results from NFS or CIFS and what versions, mounting protocols, etc? Found this interesting tidbit in wiki : January 2012 Compuverde, Blekinge Institute of Technology and Ericsson received recognition from the Development of Knowledge and Competence (KK-stiftelsen) in Sweden for a joint venture project on big data storage solutions and cloud computing. :) On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Sogand Shirinbab <sogand.shirinbab at bth.se> wrote: > ----- Forwarded by Sogand Shirinbab/Staff/BTH on 2013-01-22 10:55 ----- > > From: Sogand Shirinbab/Staff/BTH > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Date: 2013-01-16 14:35 > Subject: performance evaluation of distributed storage systems > ________________________________ > > > > Hi, > > I'm a phd student and as a part of my research I've compared performance of > different distributed storage systems (Gluster, Openstack, Compuverde). I > would like you as an expert in your product to give me feedback on my work. > What do you think about the way we've setup the system? does it affects the > Gluster performance? > > please find my paper as attachment to this mail! > > Best Regards, > SogandShirinbab > > > Blekinge Tekniska H?gskolan > 371 79 Karlskrona > 0455 -385709 > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
