On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 04:04:43PM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote: > On 01/19/2013 01:43 PM, F. Ozbek wrote: > >try moosefs. http://www.moosefs.org/ > > > >we tried both gluster and ceph, they both failed in many ways. > >moosefs passed the same tests with flying colors. > > > >moose is your friend. > > Don't you think it's rather bad form to come on a mailing list for > one project and recommend a competitor based on FUD? To me it sounds to me like he's suggesting an alternative based on actual testing and real-world experience. Or are you saying he has an undisclosed connection to the moosefs project? I googled "ozbek moosefs" and got no hits.
