I know. But I think, each file written four times on speed of storage (190MB/s, if network is not overloaded), and overall performance is remains on usable level. And on two same (by hardware) servers in replicated, not distributed mode with scheme "2 bricks, 2 servers, 1x2 redundancy" I got about 100MB/s write performance without any tuning (with default settings). Why on 4 servers with 2x2 formula I got only 50MB/s with any tuning settings? What speed I get in planned implementation - 9 servers in distributed and replicated mode with 3x3 redundancy? 5Mb/s? Maybe some system and/or gluster tweals can help me, or I going by wrong way? My use-case is simple - distributed, redundant shared storage for Openstack cloud. Initially we planing to use 9 servers in 3x3 scheme, in future - much more. 2013/2/27 Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> > On 02/27/2013 07:34 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >> >> What are your volume settings? Have you adjusted the cache sizes? >> > > Sorry.. I see your original post and the settings now. > > ______________________________**_________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.**org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-**users<http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users> > -- With best regards, differentlocal (www.differentlocal.ru | differentlocal at gmail.com), System administrator. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130227/7498573f/attachment.html>
