On 02/19/13 01:10, ruben malchow wrote: > i thought i could achieve this by doing striping. in this scenarion, i would do stripe+replicate, with nodes 1-5 acting as > a stripe set and nodes 6-10 acting as it's replica. > > with this setup, i would expect something in the range of 300-500MByte/s ? but actually, i see something in the range > of 100-200. > > i assume that i am doing something wrong - either in the way i deal with block sizes and/or with the way i try to use read-ahead. > i was hoping read-ahead could be configured to start preparing the next stripe while the first one is reading and so on > as a remedy for latency issues - is this correct? > Striping isn't what you think it is... http://joejulian.name/blog/should-i-use-stripe-on-glusterfs/ -- Mr. Flibble King of the Potato People
